Dipdive message

Close

Dipdive

Sign up

| Recover password

Channel Finder

Show all Random

 

You don't have Adobe Flash Player

You need the Adobe Flash Player to experience Dipdive media.

Download

Dip•politics

share this

Off the Road

Image

With gas prices soaring, Bush and McCain are trying to push the oil agenda again. It’s a very simple (i.e., simplistic) argument: you’re paying too much for gas so you should allow them to drill for more, and presto! Your problems will be solved.

Never mind a geo-political climate that renders the physical amount of oil a moot point in terms of pricing, never mind ecological considerations, never mind that this is the same sort of short-sighted thinking that has steered this administration—and by extension, this whole country—into our current condition.

McCain is joining Bush in his favorite game. They hope to channel our anxieties toward legislation that in some infinitesimal and vague manner connects to a problem, but in reality serves another agenda entirely. This particular issue is a break from the old standby fears that the Republicans love to capitalize on - namely, the Fear of Terrorism and the Fear of Foreigners. This one taps into a fear that is uniquely American: the Fear of Losing Car Culture.

Let’s call it Kerouac-a-phobia.

When I was a teenager, like many before me, I was the stereotypical Jack Kerouac reader. I discovered his novel On the Road and immediately needed to drive across the country. The freedom of the highway beckoned to me, shimmering on the horizon: a dusty, chrome relic from a bygone era. I wanted to meet interesting and passionate people, to discover America, to scribble literary gems in my notebook… to change my life forever.

When I was 18, I actually made this dream a reality. I spent a summer crisscrossing the country with my two best friends. This year marks the 10th anniversary of that epic trip and we’ve talked about doing it again. But the sad truth is that we made our first road odyssey in 1998, when gas prices were at record lows. Now all three of us are in grad school; the fact is, we might not be able to afford a repeat trip.

But our road trip is complicated by more than simple economics. It’s difficult to reconcile the indulgence of this type of vacation with my politics. In terms of the environment, foreign conflicts over oil, and suburban sprawl, a voyage of self-discovery that runs at 40 MPGs (at best) is a tough thing to rationalize.

There’s a very personal basis to this target of the Republican fear machine and that’s that even the most liberal among us have a hard time letting go of our love for cars. We’re weaned on the automobile, especially in the West, where cities and towns spread outward with nary a train or subway to be found. Before I had my license, I was a prisoner, an aimless fool, a child. Turning 16 and being granted that magical, laminated slip of paper was the defining moment of adulthood. It’s no wonder I seized onto Kerouac, William Least Heat-Moon andRobert M. Pirsig as my literary touchstones.

There are signs that this is changing, that car culture might finally be losing its grip on our hearts and minds. Because of this, I’m trying to see gas prices not so much as a huge inconvenience that needs to be remedied but as something that can finally push us toward necessary alternatives. But here’s the catch: such a shift will only occur at the level of policy if we articulate it more precisely within our own lives.

In other words, if we let our grumbling about gas prices simply become about reduction in cost, then inane proposals to lift the ban on offshore drilling or to take “gas tax holidays” remain politically viable.

We should be grumbling but about other things: the policies that got us here in the first place, the auto industryand, most fundamentally, the culture of the car that we ourselves perpetuate. In Europe, gas prices have been high for decades, and it’s no wonder they’ve been way ahead of us in terms of efficiency and size. We now have a real and personal incentive to increase public transportation, seek alternative fuels and work on more sensible urban development.

In this light, high gas prices are actually an opportunity to mobilize support for causes that seemed fringe and alarmist only a few years ago. Liberal guilt is never much of an inspirational message for most Americans, but $50 at the pump says a lot. Only gas prices have been able to motivate a profound shift in perspective; in today’s climate, everybody should agree that tax breaks for Hummers is a lot crazier than fueling a car with theoil from French Fries (or, if we need to convince certain Americans, Freedom Fries).

So even us latter-day wannabe hobos can’t get too absorbed by Kerouac-a-phobia. Whatever form it takes—a gripping desire to keep that gas guzzling SUV, a tendency to name your car, an addiction to Route 66 chachkas—we can’t let it be hijacked by conservatives. Lamenting the passing of car culture will soon be like lamenting the loss of the Wild West: both were always a bit larger than life, mythical, reckless and fleeting.

Even Kerouac saw the writing on the wall. By the 1950’s, he felt like road tripping had been co-opted by the Man. In his later novel Big Sur, his literary counterpart stands on the side of a highway, reflecting on the cars that whiz by. He thinks smugly about the men and women inside who peer over a “previously printed blue-lined roadmap distributed by happy executives in neckties… ” It was already too tame for him, the very culture he had helped to articulate and define. Worst of all, no one will pick him up: “This is the first time I’ve hitch hiked in years and I soon begin to see that things have changed in America, you can’t get a ride anymore… ”

Oh Jack, hitchhiking was long gone by the time I was born, as was freight hopping and bindles and any semblance of a Western Frontier. As romantic as those things sound, I’m sure there are other adventures to be had in our crazy American night. We may just have to walk.

Rider Strong

avatar rider-strong wrote 6 months ago

 

Comments

Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Razed By Wolves said: Marty I’m glad to hear you meet a payroll and aren’t one of those collectivist folks who favor equality of outcome over equality of opportunity. As a small business owner you act rationally to maximize your personal profit and limit your tax liability, legally of course. There is no difference between your business ethics and those of the energy companies you demonize other than hypocrisy. You have repeatedly suggested there is a strategy among the largest oil refiners in this country to systematically consolidate the oil refining business through plant closings and the acquisition of smaller independents in order to “restrict refining capacity and increase their profits.” It’s time we put the lie to that squalid little conspiracy theory. After oil price controls were lifted in 1981 and taxpayers stopped paying subsidies to Big Oil [thanks Ron] inefficient refineries went out of business yet overall capacity increased by 2 million barrels PER DAY. Doesn’t sound like a nefarious decrease in refining capacity to me. You quoted without understanding a WSJ report that utilization rates in April had fallen from 90% to 81% of capacity as evidence of an artificial supply restriction and price gouging. This explains why liberals are so often the victims of unintended consequences; they tend to confuse cause with effect. The “economic reason” that oil refiners are not running at full capacity is the fact that during periods of rapidly increasing crude oil prices they make less money. It’s counter intuitive I know, so read this short backgrounder at Kiplingers.com from May 9, 2008, by senior editor Jeffrey R. Kosnett, in which he warns investors NOT to buy shares of independent oil refiners because aren’t making money. The stock value of many independent refiners dropped by more than half in the last year, so according to the Marty Theory of Evil Oil™ this should make them prime targets for takeover and vertical integration by major oil companies. Mr Kosnett writes “Don't expect the oil giants to buy out the independent refiners. A few years ago, when gasoline prices first crossed $2 a gallon, executives from Big Oil said flatly that it made no sense for them to build refineries because returns wouldn't be sufficient.” The last time I highlighted the miserable rate of return in the refining segment Marty trotted out profit numbers for the five biggest oil companies that were generated from exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas at a time of record prices, instead of refining operations. He insinuates there is something obscene about profit margins in the petroleum industry. Senator Ron Wyden’s 2001 report is laughable as Nancy Pelosi’s April, 2006 election year promise that “Democrats have a commonsense plan to help bring down skyrocketing gas prices by cracking down on price gouging, rolling back the billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies, tax breaks and royalty relief given to big oil and gas companies, and increasing production of alternative fuels.” How’s that one working out every time you fill the tank? Senator Wyden believes he has raised serious questions about limited gas supplies and high prices with such damning internal documents as a thank you note from one oil company executive to another that reads: “ARCO represents an important part of Tosco’s business. We want to do everything we can to nurture this important business relationship and make sure it keeps up the tradition of being mutually beneficial.” If you don’t already believe Marty’s Theory of Evil Oil™ this fable is not going to convince you. Repeated investigations by the FTC have found no evidence of anti-competitive practices in the oil industry. Every time the price of gas goes up some grandstanding clown in Congress demands an investigation into price gouging by the industry. The 2006 Federal Trade Commission report in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina explored allegations of price gouging but found “no evidence to suggest that refiners manipulated prices through any means” and “no evidence to suggest that refinery expansion decisions over the past 20 years resulted from either unilateral or coordinated attempts to manipulate prices.” In the first quarter of 2008 energy companies earned an average of 7.4 cents on every dollar of sales compared to 7.6 cents for all US manufacturing. From 2003 to 2007 [boom years for the oil industry] average earnings were 8.3 cents per dollar of sales compared to 7.3 cents for all other manufacturing. The net incomes to sales for pharmaceutical, health care and financial services companies are often double and triple that amount. Everybody understands that 7% of a hundred billion is a lot of money, yet government taxes are higher than oil company profits and our moral hypocrites don’t call that greed. The largest artificial restriction on oil supplies for decades has been Congressional prohibitions on exploration and production of our domestic oil sources in the Rockies, the continental shelf and ANWR. On Wednesday, New York senator Charles Schumer said if the Saudis “produced half a million barrels more oil a day the price would come down a very significant amount and, at the same time, it would stop the speculation that keeps driving up the price of oil.” One million barrels a day is what would be flowing from ANWR if President Clinton had not vetoed legislation in 1995 to allow it. It’s time to start favoring the American consumer over the environmental lobby and fully develop our domestic energy resources.
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Jacque Denise Yap said: I'd say that This early, i really can't tell which i would side with, but i am leaning towards obama. Furthermore, the GOP base is not even warming up to mccain (of course, i could be wrong) and even though it's still early in the game, this just proves to show how we see our candidates to-date. i know i will get burned for this, but i think mccain is a warmonger. i get the impression that he doesn't care to what happens to our troops in the middle east and the other parts of the world. Can’t we just all get along? i think it is time for a purification; i think it is time for a change; i think it is time for obama time. Now that the candidates are set for the US Presidential Election, Barack Obama and John McCain are beginning to set the tone for their campaign.i wouldn't know the first thing about all this hoopla as i am just a biker chick, and usually get everything for free Innocent but i found this poll thing of sorts at pollcash and it is interesting how they forming an unofficial debate/poll of sorts about this whole oil drilling thing. Nothing will bring down prices today except a tipping point in perception. Getting off and doing something to housing market crisis. And now our U.S presidential candidates Obama and McCain are talking about it, the issues surrounding recent discussions on the housing market crisis has significant impact for all Americans. Presidential Candidates on housing Market
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Anna said: And, yeah. . . I said "young" twice there. I need to go to sleep (g). Anna in Michigan "Saying, 'There are no absolutes,' sounds like a pretty absolute statement to me."
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Anna said: Good points on both sides, guys. Unrelated note, I don't think it's necessary for intelligent people to resort to low blows and name calling to prove a point. It kind of makes me not want to take anything that person says seriously. . . even if I want to follow their argument, I kind of just shut them out on principle. Bullies don't get airplay in my head, I guess. It makes me sad too, because it seems like when one person who espouses a certain viewpoint acts like a jerk while stating their opinion, it makes anyone reading think that the other people who feel that way are equally jerk-like. And we're not. Anyway, Rider, I may not always agree with you conclusions or viewpoints, but I always enjoy reading your posts here. Thank God for young, intelligent, articulate young men. Anna in Michigan
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Larry Richman said: Another excellent piece. Just to touch on one aspect of this "crisis," it's amazing that anyone believes that opening new areas for drilling is going to make any difference at all in America's dependence on foreign oil, let alone the price at the pump. $4 a gallon gas is a byproduct of many factors, supply and demand being the chief but not the only ones. Speculation is another and may actually be the #1 leading contributor to it at the moment. But reducing the price of a barrel of oil by controlling speculation isn't really an option. That leaves supply and demand. How fast is the supply dropping vs. the demand rising? Not nearly as much. Oil is still free-flowing and will continue to be for quite some time. But demand is skyrocketing. It would be much more effective to reduce demand, and would actually have an effect at the gas pump much sooner, than to increase supply. But asking Americans to reduce demand is to the oil companies what telling people to stop eating so much meat is to McDonald's. It's just not what they want to hear. It also means that the President must ask Americans to sacrifice, and that is political suicide. Declaring that new stores of oil can be magically opened up with the stroke of a pen is much more telegenic. It looks good on the evening news and makes it appear as though the government actually cares about doing something. But the only ones who benefit are the oil companies and the politicians who side with the decision -- assuming, that is, people actually buy it. Hopefully Americans are more intelligent than that. This idea is flawed on so many levels. For one thing, it can take up to 10 years from the time any new offshore lease is opened up until it actually makes its way as gasoline into someone's car (the same applies to ANWR). For another, even if that oil can be brought to market and refined sooner, it won't have any effect at all on gasoline prices anytime soon. In fact, it can have just the opposite effect. The promise of supposedly limitless new oil production will put a damper on any conservation efforts and simply continue to fuel Americans' gas guzzling habits. Worst of all, though, is a little known secret (although some media outlets, thankfully, mention it) -- the oil companies already have huge stockpiles of potential reserves which they are not developing now at all. Thousands of acres of land in the west and miles and miles of shoreline and in the Gulf of Mexico are already open for drilling and are not being touched. It's like walking up to someone at an all-you-can-eat buffet and offering them a free slice of pie at your restaurant down the street. They have all they could ever want right there. It's nothing more than a publicity stunt. The bottom line: oil companies are not acting in the best interests of the United States and its security. They are acting in the best interests of their shareholders, which is the way it is supposed to work, after all. Unless the US nationalizes its oil companies like Venezuela and Mexico we will never stop importing cheaper foreign oil that costs less for the oil companies to develop and refine than the oil we have here. We can never be energy independent unless and until it becomes cheaper to create the energy here, whether wind, water, whatever, than it now costs for the energy we currently get from oil, gas, etc. That's why we are now seeing wind farms being constructed -- it is now competitive with oil because the price of a barrel has gone up so high. If the oil companies were truly interested in the security of the US and our becoming energy independent they would get out of the oil and gas business and move their development money into renewable resources like wind and water. Eventually it would be cheaper than oil and gas and the shareholders would benefit.
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Casey said: I in NO way think you are an enviro-wako, and I have no way of knowing whether or not you are a stoner, but I do think there has to be a compromise in the oil industry. For example, the war in Iraq is mostly (if not all) about oil, that I will grant you. And the oil we have in America can cut down the cost of oil. A good point was made that if we drill in a little part of Alaska then the gas prices will go down. There must be a compromise since obviously we rely too much on the middle east for things, though we are at war with them.
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Nancy Byrd said: Thanks for these words. I said the very same things to my son the other evening - not so well stated but nonetheless heartfelt! You can always bike across the US. That may satisfy like no other...
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Dan Richards said: What a wonderful utopian dream. No matter how much we try, for the present, oil, coal and to a limited degree nuclear is what drives our economy. All the eco nuts looking thru their utopian glasses, railing against nuclear power, ANWAR, drilling on the continental shelf, oil shale development, liquifying coal will one day wake up. No matter how much we try it will be at least 20 or so years before any viable alternative energy source will come on line to replace fossil fuels as our primary energy source. Blaming Shell, EXXON, and other oil companies is out of line. American oil companies are far down the line as far as dictating world energy policies. They have been regulated, taxed, investigated, blamed for our predicament by being scape goats People really believe the hype and causes and over simplification of the real problem, which is our short sighted politicians. Developing alternative energy sources will be a long and tedious process. The American people realize we have a problem and support research and anternative solutions. All this finger pointing certainly will not help the problem. We need to get politics out of the equation and start viewing this as a national problem and not a Democrat or Republican issue. If we eliminate earmarks and put that money into alternative energy research, it would go a long way toward solving the problem. It seems so simple to place blame. We are all part of the problem by letting politicians set the priorities for their own benefit. We need a house cleaning in Washington and term limits so we don't have the career politicians feathering their own beds. The seniority system in Washington is broken.
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Razed By Wolves said: If you post links the server thinks you're a spambot. Search for "Oil Refiners Cheap for a Reason washingtonpost" to find that Jeffrey R Kosnett article about market trends in the refining industry, and "FTC 2006 Market Forces, Competitive Dynamics, and Gasoline Prices" for the PDF.
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Razed By Wolves said: The Republican Fear Machine is tapping into our Fear of Losing Car Culture thesis seems like a stretch even for a twenty something stoner grad student. So if Republicans say our car culture is going away that’s fear mongering, but when Greenies scream The Sky Is Warming! that’s not? The environment is an incredibly complex and constantly changing system, those who call the question of global warming settled are demonstrating their belief system rather than any scientific certainty. There is a curious disconnect from reality that you sense from the friends of Gaia as if they have no actual experience of nature and think the natural world was just a blissful Eden instead of constant warfare and malaria. That’s why high oil prices are a good thing, we can get back to the living standards of pre-industrial America when the infant mortality rate was 25% and one in seven women died in childbirth. Or better yet, let’s use activist environmental organizations to discourage economic development and modernization in the third world. We’ll call it sustainable development [no development] and the preservation of indigenous peoples and lifestyles, all that energy and technology just expands their carbon footprint anyway. The policies that got us where we are today are the result of listening to holier than thou enviro-wacko’s like Mr Rider Strong here. No drilling on the continental shelf even though Cuba has chartered Chinese oil companies 50 miles off the coast of Florida, no drilling in that frozen hell hole called ANWR that nobody will ever see much less care about, and no new oil refineries built in over 30 years leaving us vulnerable to the whipsaw effects of supply and demand on the spot oil market. We know who to blame and it’s not Kerouac, who said “It is not my fault that certain so-called bohemian elements have found in my writings something to hang their peculiar beatnik theories on.”
 

Add comment

You need to be logged in to do this

You will need a Dipdive account and you will need to be
logged in to use this function. An account is free, let's create one right now!