Dipdive message

Close

Dipdive

Sign up

| Recover password

Channel Finder

Show all Random

 

You don't have Adobe Flash Player

You need the Adobe Flash Player to experience Dipdive media.

Download

Dip•politics

share this

Obama to New Yorker: Drop Dead

Image

I defended Obama on FISA. I approved of him refining his Iraq position. And of course I agreed with him when he toned down his anti-free trade rhetoric. But Obama refusing to have a sense of humor? This I will not stand for.

I thought The New Yorker cover was funny. Maybe some people don’t. Maybe some people are offended, although I can’t imagine why. But why did the Obama campaign object?

The New Yorker may think, as one of their staff explained to us, that their cover is a satirical lampoon of the caricature Senator Obama’s right-wing critics have tried to create,” Obama spokesman Bill Burton said. “But most readers will see it as tasteless and offensive. And we agree.”

What that sounds like to me (and I’m just going off my gut here, so sue me for not citing a source or anything) is this: we get the joke, but we’re afraid stupid people won’t. And that’s the kind of elitism that bugs me.

A year ago, no one thought this country was ready for a black President. Or a smart President. But guess what? Obama won the Iowa caucus. He won Wisconsin. He even won the Idaho caucus by 64 points! Maybe it’s time that we give people the benefit of the doubt.

Besides, will anyone that actually reads The New Yorker get the wrong idea about the cover?

This is nothing more than the politics of umbrage — scoring political points by acting offended at something. Perhaps candidates think they look tough when they’re offended. To me, they just look like they’re taking themselves too seriously.

And then there’s the cynical read. What if the Obama campaign isn’t offended at all? What if they knew that the only way that people that don’t read The New Yorker would see the cover at all is if they objected? Perhaps they wanted the cover on the nightly news. Why? For two reason. One, to feed the storyline that liberals are mad at Obama. And two, because in every story about The New Yorker cover, the news anchor will have to say that the cover is satirical, and that Obama is not, in fact, a Muslim or a terrorist. Maybe the Obama camp thinks that the best way of confronting the jihadist-Manchurian-candidate meme is to become outraged by it.

If it works, then perhaps it will all be worth it. However, I’m saddened on a personal level that Obama couldn’t just laugh this one off.

Hillel Aron

 

 

avatar hillel-aron wrote 5 months and 21 days ago

 

Comments

Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
serenity said: Do note that the McCain campaign people agreed that it's tasteless...
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Rafael Arribalzaga said: Hi people, I´m just let you my blog with a vision of the political environment at this moment, a link between Obama, The New Yorker cover and the Guantanamo 16 years old boy. Thanks and see you soon! www.fresco101.com.ar
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
M said: I don't think I've ever seen a funny cartoon in the New Yorker.
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Theresa said: Lets put McCain on the cover with him capturing asians...lets see how he would respond. My guess is that he would not be happy. I didn't find it funny at all and that has nothing to do with a sence of humor. It has to do with respect and clearly the New Yorker doesn't have any!!
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Isa Aron said: I disagree. The LA Times had an interesting column on Tuesday 7/15, showing other New Yorker covers by the same cartoonist. The one that came closest to this one had Dick Cheney in an easy chair reading the paper and smoking a cigar, with George Bush standing beside him dressed as a parlor maid with a feather duster. I found it funny because it makes fun of the fact that Bush appears, often, to be doing Cheney's bidding, rather than the other way around. It made fun of Bush and Cheney, NOT the people who criticize them. And it spoke to an essential truth (at least I believe it to be true) about the relationship between the two. This cartoon, in contrast, purported to make fun of those who spread (or believe) false rumors about Obama. But the cartoon itself made fun of the Obamas, in a way that doesn't contain ANY truths -- Obama would not burn the American flag, Michelle Obama is NOT like Angela Davis, etc. I agree that few readers of the New Yorker believe these rumors, so hopefully this cartoon will help spread the word that the rumors are ridiculous, in the way you suggest. As a life-long reader of the New Yorker, I wasn't outraged. But I was disappointed, and I wondered: what were they thinking, and how could they have mis-judged this?
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Kio said: No funny, disrespectful.
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
VAE said: I come from china, I have seen in China this news. But I will support Obama. U.S. refueling, the Sino-US friendship!
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
prana9 said: Agree 100%. I found the Obama response cliche and condescending. He was brave to speak honestly and openly about taboo subjects like race but he seems less courageous on more trivial subjects like political humor and satire. He's moving to the middle, compromising on many things unfortunately intelligence is now one of them.
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
joshua Chamberlain said: Its just not a good joke. You people hate freedom.
 

Add comment

You need to be logged in to do this

You will need a Dipdive account and you will need to be
logged in to use this function. An account is free, let's create one right now!