Dipdive message

Close

Dipdive

Sign up

| Recover password

Channel Finder

Show all Random

 

You don't have Adobe Flash Player

You need the Adobe Flash Player to experience Dipdive media.

Download

Dip•politics

share this

The Gaffe Crisis

Image

Every few years, there seems to be a Republican politician who develops a reputation as a veritable gaffe-master — a person who cannot go more than three days without some sort of verbal mix-up causing him a landslide of ridicule. First we had Dan Quayle, whose infamous “potatoe” incident will forever haunt his Wikipedia page/life (they’re one and the same, right?) Then there was President George W. Bush, who’s had so many bloopers I’m surprised Dick Clark and Ed McMahon haven’t volunteered to host a special about them. Now we have Senator John McCain, the elderly statesman running for President. For years, he never really had a rep for being gaffe-worthy, but as he creeps towards the ripe old age of 72, the slip-ups have been coming fast and furious.

Or have they?

The media has taken McCain to task over his gaffes, but I like to think that they’re not so much errors as they are carefully calculated political moves. Take, for example, his recent alleged confusion over Iraq and Afghanistan. On Good Morning America, he stated, “I’m afraid it’s a very hard struggle, particularly given the situation on the Iraq/Pakistan border.” Now obviously, it’s Afghanistan that borders on Pakistan, but while some may see that as an error, I see that as a searing commentary on the mess in the Middle East. Everything’s turned into chaos out there; names, borders, common sense — they all just don’t even matter anymore. Translation: bomb it all!

Of course, this wasn’t McCain’s only alleged mix-up.”How can we bring pressure on the government of Somalia?” he asked on his “Straight Talk Express.” Everyone laughed at this — surely the grandpa meant “Sudan,” not “Somalia” — but I beg to differ. I think he knew exactly which country he was talking about. Why not put pressure on Somalia? You know, to set an example for Sudan? Heck, to set an example for the world. After all, it’s a well-known fact that as goes Somalia, so goes Sudan. Seriously — get with it, people.

Another time, after a trip to Germany, McCain referred to controversial Russian leader Vladimir Putin as “President Putin of Germany.” To some, this could have seemed “disrespectful” or “curious” or “completely false,” but clearly no one sees the brilliance of such a move. As we all know, the lovely yet sturdy Angela Merkel reigns over Deutschland; so for McCain to say that Putin is the president of Germany — well, it’s basically a veiled way of calling him a girl. Pretty sneaky.Pretty awesome.

Lastly, there was the speech in Phoenix this month where McCain made mention of Czechoslovakia as if it still actually existed. Even worse, this was his third time over the past few months in doing so. Critics again took the opportunity to pounce, but while some may say McCain is either woefully out of touch with the ever-evolving world or simply too old to keep his facts straight, I say pish-posh. Clearly this was his way of subtly reminding us that the specter of communism still lingers in many areas of the world. The Czech Republic and Slovakia could reunite at any moment — as could the Soviet Union. The Cold War 2.0 is nigh, and as long as we have President Putin of Germany acting up, conflict on the Iraqi/Pakistani border, and Somalia murdering hundreds of thousands, our world could plunge right back into chaos. It’s a scary world, and I’m starting to think that John McCain might be the only one to understand it.

Ben Mandelker

 

 

Photo by Marc Nozell

avatar ben-mandelker wrote 5 months and 7 days ago

 

Comments

Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Sevie said: Your sarcasm is overdone, schmuck. Didnt the democrats legislate against agism, scofflaw. A really astonishing gaffe occured during the primarys when B.O. responded with "I'll look at it" when asked to discuss the results of higher capital gains taxes and the congressionaly outlawed drilling of oil in U.S. waters. He's disclosed since then that he doesnt want to drill for oil, citing its a really dumb idea and also that he plans to tax wages, ssi, investment returns, small business, large business and actually doesnt have a problem with a tax on gasoline being collected at the pump. After all the Europeans do it and they are his model of progress, right.
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
The Dalai Bama said: Be sure to add the Obama Energy Plan to the list of gaffes. Barak claims that keeping your tires inflated and getting regular tune-ups is supposed to equal "all the oil that they're talking about getting off drilling" in ANWR and the continental shelf. How many orders of magnitude was he wrong by? The answer is here: http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/07/021122.php
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
sevie said: Lets extrapolate; if we all acquire a bicycle pump and an oat bag we'd be doing our bit for the cause - Reed/Pelosi bill pending.
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
The Dalai Bama said: Flop. Obama now favors offshore drilling. "My attitude is that we can find some sort of compromise," Obama told the Times shortly after talking with voters at Gibbs High School. "If it is part of an overarching package, then I am not going to be rigid in preventing an energy package that goes forward that is really thoughtful and is going to really solve the problem." http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/elections/article752490.ece
 
Archive 2 months and 25 days ago
Chris said: Actually "my friends" if you work the calculations yourself - with a little hard work you don't need to rely on someone else... The amount that the GAO estimates is wasted (2006) every year is approximately 180 thousand barrels of oil per day. This waste is a direct result of the extra drag created by underinflated tires (keep in mind that this doesn't account for the "wear and tear" on the tire which results in greater tire consumption and the energy/resources used to produce the tires... I'm sure you'll conveniently ignore that fact like McCain generally does). The amount of oil that would be generated by Offshore drilling (which is the issue at hand) MAY generate a peak flow of approximately 200 thousand barrels a day by 2030 (industry "experts" quoted from Time magazine). So, I would say that by political standards - its not a true statement.... Remember you can fudge a little in politics (eg. when McCain mentioned the leisurely stroll that he and Petraeus took down the streets of Baghdad). Bottom line - McCain is a joke when it comes to anything of an economic nature... And if you put him in office he'll show you how bad the economy gets when he gets us into another war with Iran.
 

Add comment

You need to be logged in to do this

You will need a Dipdive account and you will need to be
logged in to use this function. An account is free, let's create one right now!